Frequent manual and non-destructive testing (NDT) inspections are standard practice in port terminals, steel plants, and bridge infrastructure to ensure the health and safety of assets.
However, these inspections can pose significant challenges and limitations that impact overall efficiency and cost-effectiveness:
Resource-Intensive Processes: Manual inspections require significant manpower, time, and coordination, especially when assets are geographically dispersed or located in hard-to-reach areas. This can strain resources, diverting skilled personnel from other critical tasks and driving up labor costs.
Operational Disruptions: Inspections often necessitate equipment shutdowns or access restrictions, leading to operational downtime. For industries that rely on continuous operation, even short interruptions can result in lost productivity and revenue, affecting the bottom line.
High Costs Over Time: Although individual inspections may seem manageable, the cumulative costs of frequent inspections quickly add up. The expense of labor, equipment access (e.g., scaffolding or lifts), and specialized inspection tools or techniques (such as ultrasonic testing or radiography) can become a financial burden over time.
Potential Safety Risks: Some inspections, especially those that involve reaching elevated or confined spaces, expose personnel to safety risks. Reducing the frequency of manual inspections can help minimize these risks and contribute to a safer work environment.
Inconsistent or Incomplete Data: Manual and NDT inspections can be limited in their ability to detect certain types of asset degradation, particularly when damage is beneath the surface or in areas that are difficult to access. The quality and consistency of inspection data can vary depending on the inspector's skill and the methods used, potentially leading to overlooked or undetected issues.
Reactive Rather Than Proactive Maintenance: Frequent manual inspections often reflect a reactive maintenance approach, where issues are addressed as they arise. This can result in costly emergency repairs and unplanned downtime if a critical issue is missed between inspection intervals.
Limited Insight for Long-Term Asset Health: Inspections provide snapshots of asset condition at a specific point in time, making it difficult to track gradual deterioration or emerging trends. Without continuous monitoring, organizations may struggle to accurately predict when maintenance is truly needed, leading to either over-maintenance or sudden failures.
By transitioning to data-driven asset monitoring, Villari enables organizations to overcome these limitations. Our technology provides real-time, continuous insights that help optimize maintenance schedules, reduce inspection frequency, and enhance asset reliability—ultimately lowering costs and minimizing downtime. Follow me to learn more about structural health monitoring.
Comments